A rather abrasive title for a post, perhaps, but it comes from a conversation that I had with someone on the train this morning. An individual who works for a FE college in Essex (both shall remain anonymous) was telling me of some courses that he teaches in. Or rather, talking about the students who are studying for qualifications in the department in which he teaches - performing arts.
Apparently, most of the students are unable to perform and have little commitment to any eventual career in the performing arts. Only a few go on to study performing arts at university, fewer still at the well renowned ones. Those who do not go on to study to a higher level, yet stick with a career in performing arts, invariably end up in Butlins or on a cruise ship. A significant number of the students end up selling insurance, working in sales or admin, factories or agriculture - jobs where a qualification in the arts would at best offer no advantage, and at worse hinder the chances of employment.
Many of the students arrive thinking they will be famous, most via shows such as X-Factor. The tutors, teachers and course managers know that the students are arriving with this false hope. They know that the vast majority of students will leave with a “vocational qualification” that will make them no more employable than one in strawberry picking. They know that the majority of the students are wasting their time. Yet the FE colleges are funded by the government to offer these courses. The college managers are perfectly happy to accept the country’s hard-earned cash in exchange for a qualification that offers very few tangible benefits. How the teaching staff keep motivated, given the person that I spoke to was so up-front about the shortcomings of the course, is beyond me.
But, after this conversation, I have some questions.
How many other courses are funded by the government, all in the name of keeping people off the official unemployment statistics? How much money is being wasted on training our teenagers in skills they will never use in their adult lives? How many schools are feeding teenagers with false hopes when they advise them to start these “vocational” courses? How much intrinsic bias is there in the education system, whereby education of any description is better than a job, regardless of the consequences? Would it not make more economical sense to have vocational qualifications that are taught ‘on the job’, perhaps by day release to FE colleges, rather than ones based solely at FE colleges?
As someone with the greatest respect for education, I believe in educating oneself for the sole purpose of personal development. But I have to question the effectiveness of the government’s policy on vocational education.